#### Leave a Comment:

#### (0) comments

Add Your Reply

For all our prospective med-school students (and others alike) who are currently enrolled in EPIB 507 here in McGill, you must have wondered about why you took a course such as *biostatistics* in the first place, and as you have already experienced, our biostats course — as opposed to courses in the regular semesters — has a span only one month, and covered an incredible amount of indigestible materials.

Overwhelmed? Well, don’t be! To lower your systolic (and diastolic) blood pressure levels, we thought that we would put up a course recap that would combine what you have learnt in biostats thus far, into a meaningful and coherent perspective, thereby assuring you that your current academic/medical pursuit is not a total waste of time. 😉

In a few words, biostatistics, as far as we are concerned, pertains mostly to applied statistics within an epidemiological and biological framework. It differs from the usual statistics in its emphasis on concepts such as **specificity***,* **false positive** and **randomized clinical trials**, and on metrics such as **odd ratios***, ***prevalence*** *and** relative risks**.

While we haven’t quite approached biostatistics from a mathematician’s standpoint, we did cover a plethora of ways on how it is applied in a medical research setting, which — as it turns out — could be useful to some of you who are newly involved with pharmaceuticals or otherwise interested in public health.

Similar to the way statistics is taught in other faculties, descriptive biostatistics are concerned with describing the *gist* of the data, usually via clever visual data representations such as **stacked bar graphs** and **two-way frequency tables**. Here, concepts such as **geometric mean** and **coefficient of variation** can be easily found in other non-medical domains as well, and the materials are, in general, pretty straight forward and intelligible.

While seemingly unrelated to the pursuit of statistical analysis, having some chop in basic probability paves the way for understanding more advanced applications in inferential statistics. It’s no surprise that virtually all stats courses offered in universities tend to ramble a bit on probability, with some courses covering more than others. In EPIB 507, our focus is on learning the basic laws used in counting and computation of probability (e.g., **law of union**, **law of intersection**, **Bayes’ Theorem**, **law of total probability**).

Equipped with the basic notions, we then moved on to the concept of **random variable**, and its ancillaries metrics (e.g., **expected value**, **standard deviation**). We covered many examples of discrete distributions (e.g., **binomial**, **geometric**, **hypergeometric **and **Poisson** distributions), along with a few examples of continuous distributions (e.g., **uniform** and **normal** distributions), all of the while *evading calculus altogether*.

Inferential biostatistics is mainly concerned with drawing practical conclusions/recommendations about the populations *from the sample data*, and this is where the water starts to get murky pretty quickly. The inferences can be generally categorized into 2 types: **confidence interval **and **hypothesis testing**. From there, a whole bunch of crazy formulas would pop up non-stop, and the procedures need to be followed and underlying assumptions respected.

**Parametric procedures** are those with specific presuppositions about the *nature* and the *inter-relationship* of the populations, whereas **non-parametric procedures** are those that are to be used when the aforementioned presuppositions fail to hold. In any case, both procedures allow for **1-sample test for population mean (or median)**, and **2-sample test for differences in means (distributions) — **whether the 2 samples are matched or unmatched.

Of course, there are much, much more to this. **Confidence interval for the difference in population means**, **two-sample proportion test**, ** Fisher’s z-transformation for correlation coefficient**,

For the purpose of your own review, here is a deliberately concise review sheet which you might find helpful for your own study. Remember, don’t get too bogged down with the formulas, as they can always be found in the course pack and you *will* be allowed a crib sheet during the exam. With that in mind, maybe you should just chill out and learn the *big picture* and the *general procedures* involved? 😉

## While medicine emphasizes on stress management, the act of creating medical practitioners induce conditions which would require stress management.

**Math Vault and its Redditbots** has the singular goal of advocating for education in higher mathematics through *digital publishing* and the *uncanny* use of technologies. Head to the **Vault** for more math cookies. :)

Desmos: A Definitive Guide (How to Perform Cool Computations and Creating Great Graphs Using Online Graphing Calculator)

Chain Rule for Derivative — Venturing Into The Dark Side Beneath Applied Calculus…

The Exponent Rule for Derivatives — Your One-Stop Shop to Staircase-Looking Functions

Upcoming McGill MGCR 273 Review Session